Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


13 September 2023

Maybe it is time to ditch the smartphone (1)

From Richard Hind, Chapel Haddlesey, North Yorkshire, UK

When people ask me (usually in a shocked tone) why I don't carry a smartphone, I answer, half-joking, "because I teach cybersecurity". Amanda Ruggeri's excellent piece on data harvesting is a stark reminder of how this technology is being abused in the name of profit, which makes me feel a little less like a member …

13 September 2023

Maybe it is time to ditch the smartphone (2)

From Emma Martins, data protection commissioner, Bailiwick of Guernsey, Channel Islands

We have all contributed to, and been a witness of, the birth of a now deeply entrenched business model that makes its profits from the creation, use and exploitation of our personal data. To deal with this we need governments to legislate, laws to be enforced, the media to explore, academics to research and civil …

13 September 2023

Let's leave species names as they are (1)

From Jon Hinwood, Melbourne, Australia

We shouldn't mess with species names for the sake of 2023 ideas of virtue. As a coastal engineer, I was "house trained" by an ecologist friend and collaborator and learned a heap of names for coastal marsh plants and their ecology. Then some international body changed them all, reducing my ability to interact with botanists …

13 September 2023

Let's leave species names as they are (2)

From Geoff Sawers, Reading, UK

Regarding the fate of the genus name Brontosaurus . The specimen described as Brontosaurus excelsus in the 1870s was later reclassified as Apatosaurus , to many people's disappointment. But, in 2015, Brontosaurus was reclaimed as a genus by some researchers .

13 September 2023

Climate change: so many wasted decades

From William Hughes-Games, Waipara, New Zealand

Your climate special gives us some hope that we are on the way to decarbonisation, but also leaves an impression that the situation is going to get worse before it gets better. You have to ask yourself why politicians haven't done more. For instance, a couple of decades ago, they could have ended financial incentives …

13 September 2023

The other reason why JFK was a television winner

From Ben Haller, Ithaca, New York, US

I enjoyed your look at "the hidden powers of gesture". However, regarding the puzzle posed at the beginning – that people who listened to a debate between the US presidential nominees Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy felt Nixon won it, whereas those who watched felt Kennedy won – there may be an explanation other …

13 September 2023

We need to rethink modern wildfire strategies

From Sam Edge, Ringwood, Hampshire, UK

The story on the impact of ancient wildfires was interesting. When it comes to the threat today, most of what we do aims to stop them happening. This preserves fuel for when a wildfire does get going, making it potentially worse. We must think more strategically ( 26 August, p 9 ). Perhaps permanent settlements …

13 September 2023

Why ocean heat may not be a good energy source

From Paul Whiteley, Bittaford, Devon, UK

Glenda Dixon asks why we can't use warming oceans as a power source. Inevitable waste heat is the problem. Back in the 70s, a system used the warmth of surface water to vaporise a refrigerant and drive an electricity-generating turbine. The gas was then pumped to the cold depths to liquidise. The result is that …

13 September 2023

Please leave the spiderlings alone

From Colin Parrish, Doncaster, UK

So spiderlings kept in starvation eat siblings faster than those that are fed. No surprise! What is the purpose of such predictable research? It seems unnecessary and, surely, unethical ( 19 August, p 18 ).

13 September 2023

On the dilemma of crops that use a lot of water (1)

From Averell Kingston, Sutton under Brailes, Warwickshire, UK

Graham Lawton mentions foods that use most water ( 26 August, p 36 ). Vanilla beans are at the top of the list. A lot are grown in Madagascar, a place where many people live in poverty. This raises a dilemma: should I be supporting their livelihoods or reducing my water consumption?

13 September 2023

On the dilemma of crops that use a lot of water (2)

From Eric Carpenter, Reston, Virginia, US

You stress the thirstiness of coffee, chocolate, tea and vanilla plants, but they are grown in rainforests or in countries with monsoons providing water from rain rather than irrigation. Growing thirsty plants such as almond trees in deserts is bizarre, but taking advantage of abundant rainfall seems like a good idea.

13 September 2023

For the record

Felicity Callard at the University of Glasgow, UK, is lead investigator of the rest test ( 2 September, p 32 ).

Issue no. 3456 published 16 September 2023